Doyna Johnston
The Continuous Necessity to Adapt Technological Advances in Creating Significant Learning Environments

Throughout my life, I have had to adapt to the innovative technological changes of recent times. Adjusting to change is a sign of being flexible and open-minded. While stepping out of our comfort zone may initially feel unclear or uncomfortable, change ultimately leads to new opportunities, perspectives, and ways of doing things. Adapting to innovative technological advances will always be necessary.
​
The primary reason I enrolled in the ADL Master's Program was to enhance my pedagogical techniques as an educator in response to the evolving technology landscape. This program enables me to engage more effectively with my students and share knowledge, making the learning experience more dynamic and impactful. It offers an environment where they can exchange valuable insights and improve their critical thinking skills.
​
With this last thought in mind, we developed the concept of adapting my second-grade students' writing journals to a digital format. However, we would also need to adjust the learning methodology that teaches children how to create online journals. This is how we conceptualized Digital Writing Journals within a Blended Learning Environment alongside the COVA Approach: Choice (C), Ownership (O), Voice (V), and Authentic learning opportunities (A) (Harapnuik et al., 2018) in line with the guidelines of the ADL Master’s program in the Disruptive Innovation Course. To kick off my innovative proposal, I have launched several stages thus far, including the planning, research, development, and implementation phases. This stage involved examining numerous articles and exploring innovative learning methodologies. I created a Literature Review outlining the advantages, challenges, and optimal strategies for implementing Digital Writing Journals.
Creating my e-portfolio allowed me to experience firsthand the challenges my students would face while developing their Digital Writing Journals. I needed to explain the purpose of my project to my administrators to convey the essence of my innovative proposal—"What's my why?" Here are the main pillars of my why: Why — We believe that instilling in children the ability to write empowers them to articulate themselves clearly, analyze situations objectively, and communicate effectively within their community and the world at large. How—To do this, we create a significant blended-learning environment, set up a creative digital-writing rotating station for writing authentic digital journals, and give our young writers choice, ownership, and voice through an authentic learning opportunities (COVA) approach (Harapnuik et al., 2018). What—We prepare effective communicators who confidently interact and connect with others in this digital age by empowering their voices and expressing their ideas in writing on a digital platform.
​
Understanding by Design enabled us to plan with a clear end goal in mind. Learning facilitators and educators must design sessions to ensure success based on the desired performance outcomes. Understanding by Design (UbD) is a practical and valuable "backward" design framework. It assists educators in recognizing expected outcomes, establishing acceptable evidence for learning objectives, and progressively planning specific learning experiences and instruction to achieve the desired aim (Wiggings & McTighe, 2005). This approach helped us persuade our administrators to initiate a pilot group to assess its results.
​
To make things more precise, I constructed Fink's Three-Column Table, which carefully displays the planned goals, activities, and assessments to ensure that students learn what the learning outcomes expect them to achieve. To improve the execution of Writing Digital Journals, I implemented The Four Disciplines of Execution and The Influencer Model, which are frameworks designed to refocus our efforts on making meaningful change by focusing first on the most critical challenges; as a leader, you must consciously focus on less so the team can accomplish goals in a more significant way (McChesney et al., 2021). All of this careful planning ensures that our language learners achieve significant linguistic output. Language output performance is essential to language development because it is crucial for students to acquire and refine their language skills, which support critical thinking (Swain, 1985).
​
Digital Writing Journals within a Blended Learning Environment feature four written composition samples created according to the Texas Department of Education's guidelines. These include personal narratives, reports on informational texts, expressions of opinions and arguments, and letters of correspondence, such as thank-you notes.
​
To begin implementing our innovative proposal, we elaborated a Final Action Research Plan that led us to explore and present another alternative approach to writing composition for second graders. After presenting the results of our pilot group, we intend to continue training additional “learning facilitators” in our grade level who need to help their language learners improve their written expression in digital format. We have created a Professional Learning Plan to assist them in getting started and coach them throughout the school year to reflect on the results reached. This professional learning proposal aims to discuss with educators the benefits of combining the COVA (Harapnuik, 2018) and Blended Learning educational models for language proficiency and critical thinking development in our young language learners.
Creating my e-portfolio allowed me to experience firsthand the challenges my students would face while developing their Digital Writing Journals. I needed to explain the purpose of my project to my administrators to convey the essence of my innovative proposal—"What's my why?" Here are the main pillars of my why: Why — We believe that instilling in children the ability to write empowers them to articulate themselves clearly, analyze situations objectively, and communicate effectively within their community and the world at large. How—To do this, we create a significant blended-learning environment, set up a creative digital-writing rotating station for writing authentic digital journals, and give our young writers choice, ownership, and voice through an authentic learning opportunities (COVA) approach (Harapnuik et al., 2018). What—We prepare effective communicators who confidently interact and connect with others in this digital age by empowering their voices and expressing their ideas in writing on a digital platform.
​
Understanding by Design enabled us to plan with a clear end goal in mind. Learning facilitators and educators must design sessions to ensure success based on the desired performance outcomes. Understanding by Design (UbD) is a practical and valuable "backward" design framework. It assists educators in recognizing expected outcomes, establishing acceptable evidence for learning objectives, and progressively planning specific learning experiences and instruction to achieve the desired aim (Wiggings & McTighe, 2005). This approach helped us persuade our administrators to initiate a pilot group to assess its results.
​
To make things more precise, I constructed Fink's Three-Column Table, which carefully displays the planned goals, activities, and assessments to ensure that students learn what the learning outcomes expect them to achieve. To improve the execution of Writing Digital Journals, I implemented The Four Disciplines of Execution and The Influencer Model, which are frameworks designed to refocus our efforts on making meaningful change by focusing first on the most critical challenges; as a leader, you must consciously focus on less so the team can accomplish goals in a more significant way (McChesney et al., 2021). All of this careful planning ensures that our language learners achieve significant linguistic output. Language output performance is essential to language development because it is crucial for students to acquire and refine their language skills, which support critical thinking (Swain, 1985).
​
Digital Writing Journals within a Blended Learning Environment feature four written composition samples created according to the Texas Department of Education's guidelines. These include personal narratives, reports on informational texts, expressions of opinions and arguments, and letters of correspondence, such as thank-you notes.
​
To begin implementing our innovative proposal, we elaborated a Final Action Research Plan that led us to explore and present another alternative approach to writing composition for second graders. After presenting the results of our pilot group, we intend to continue training additional “learning facilitators” in our grade level who need to help their language learners improve their written expression in digital format. We have created a Professional Learning Plan to assist them in getting started and coach them throughout the school year to reflect on the results reached. This professional learning proposal aims to discuss with educators the benefits of combining the COVA (Harapnuik, 2018) and Blended Learning educational models for language proficiency and critical thinking development in our young language learners.
Where Am I now?
​
I am currently concluding my initial implementation and updating my innovative proposal. While the main framework and components are in place, I want to extend and further complement learning objective 2.12(B): compose literary texts, including responses to informational texts across content areas of study, to invigorate our language learners' linguistic output. Output may help language learners transition from semantic processing in comprehension to syntactic processing, which is required for their second language output, i.e., language processing (Swain, 1985).
Looking Ahead
​
As a dual language teacher, I think enabling students to produce critical thinking linguistic creation during both the oral and written expression phases is essential. Our proposal can help students in both areas. My recommendation for extending this innovative proposal would be to expand this practice to additional curriculum areas by creating activities that allow students to share their findings with the school community, boosting academic and social interaction among students.
​
Closing Remarks
​
From the time we began creating our proposal until the pilot program was implemented, we have seen an increase in our students' contextual vocabulary usage. Our children have realized that they express their opinions by elaborating on their thoughts in whole sentences.
The best way to develop critical thinking and problem-solving in our language learners is through the Constructivist Learning approach because we all learn by doing.
References
​
Covey, S., McChesney, C., & Huling, J. (2012). The 4 Disciplines of Execution: Achieving Your Wildly Important Goals. Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience & Education. MacMillan.
Harapnuik, D. (2022, May 9). It's About the Learning First [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t70YLzbeyzA
Harapnuik, D., Thibodeaux, T., & Cummings, C. (2018). COVA. Lamar University. https://tilisathibodeaux.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/COVA_eBook_Jan_2018.pdf
Horn, M., Staker, H., & Christensen, C. (2017). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. Jossey–Bass.
Mertler, C. A. (2020). Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators (6th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Newbury House.
Texas Education Agency. (2024, June). Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills: Curriculum Standards, Austin, Texas.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2008). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.